{"id":121491,"date":"2025-08-18T22:09:28","date_gmt":"2025-08-18T21:09:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pointblanknews.com\/pbn\/?p=121491"},"modified":"2025-08-18T22:09:28","modified_gmt":"2025-08-18T21:09:28","slug":"fcta-contractors-differ-over-n5-2-billion-debt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pointblanknews.com\/pbn\/news\/fcta-contractors-differ-over-n5-2-billion-debt\/","title":{"rendered":"FCTA, contractors differ over N5.2 billion debt"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
By Oscar Okhifo<\/div>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
A group of indigenous contractors on Monday stormed the Federal Capital Territory Administration Office, Abuja demanding the payment of over \u20a65.2 billion debt.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But in a swift reaction, the Senior Special Assistant to the FCT Minister on Public Communication and Social Media, Lere Olayinka, dismissed the claims, insisting that Minister,\u00a0 Nyesom Wike has not awarded any contracts to the aggrieved contractors.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u201cNo contract was awarded to any of the local contractors by the FCT Minister, Barr. Nyesom Wike. If they have documents showing award of contracts by the Minister, they should produce them,\u201d Olayinka said.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Speaking on behalf of the group, Adebola Benson said the debts were accumulated from successive administrations, including the tenure of the immediate past minister Musa Bello,\u00a0 and have since risen above \u20a65.2 billion.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u201cSo far, the liabilities calculated is in billions. Over \u20a65.2 billion is owed different contractors over time. Some of the debts accrued before Wike came, and he too has incurred some debts,\u201d Benson said.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He explained that while the previous administration paid in bits, many contractors were still left unpaid.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u201cWhen Wike came, we complained, he paid a bit and stopped since then. We are appealing to him to please pay us,\u201d Benson added.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The protesting contractors, who vowed to remain at the Secretariat gate without barricading it, included those responsible for refuse collection, renovation works, road patching, desilting, electrification, water supply, and other emergency services.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
According to them, some contracts arose from urgent interventions such as fixing burst water pipes or repairing faulty street lights along diplomatic routes when dignitaries were expected in Abuja.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
On allegations of collusion with civil servants to inflate contracts, Benson said:<\/div>\n
\u201cIf the authorities have such evidence, they can act on it, but it is unfair to punish all contractors for the alleged misconduct of a few.\u201d<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He also cited unpaid contracts under the FCT RUWASSA borehole projects, which were already commissioned but not settled.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Olayinka, however, insisted that the figures being bandied by the contractors lacked credibility. He explained that in December 2023, a bill of about \u20a610 billion was presented to the Minister as outstanding payments on \u201cminor procurements\u201d done before Wike assumed office.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u201cThe Minister approved over \u20a65 billion and payment was made immediately in December 2023. In January 2024, another \u20a65 billion was paid, clearing the over \u20a610 billion outstanding bills,\u201d Olayinka stated.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
However, he said that only three months later, contractors returned with fresh claims amounting to \u20a615 billion, allegedly from the same minor procurements.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u201cHow can you claim to have carried out jobs worth over \u20a615 billion within three months without the approval of the Minister? How can you accumulate such debt without authorization?\u201d he queried.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Olayinka noted the shifting figures from \u20a615 billion to \u20a68 billion and now \u20a65 billion, questioning the legitimacy of the claims.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Observers are now asking tough questions: are the contractors inflating the figures? Do they have verifiable evidence of jobs duly awarded, executed, supervised, and certified? If such documentation exists, they are expected to provide them. But if the contracts were not properly awarded and certified, would the FCTA be obligated to pay? Time, it seems, will tell.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n