By Chimamanda Adichie<\/p>\n
Nigeria, at independence from British rule in 1960, was called the Giant of Africa. With a large population, an educated elite and many natural resources, especially oil, Nigeria was supposed to fly the flag of democratic success. It did not, and it is clear now, in retrospect, that it could not possibly have done so. Colonial rule, as a government model, was closer to a dictatorship than a democracy. Nigeria was a young nation, created in 1914, as Nigerian children would learn in history class in the endlessly repeated sentence: \u2018Lord Frederick Lugard amalgamated the northern and southern protectorates to form one country and his wife gave it the name Nigeria.\u2019<\/p>\n
It is debatable whether, at independence, Nigeria was a nation at all. The amalgamation was an economic policy; the British colonial government needed to subsidise the poorer North with income from the resource-rich South. With its feudal system of emirs, beautiful walled cities, and centralised power systems, the North was familiar to Lord Lugard \u2013 not unlike the Sudan, where he had previously worked. In the South, the religions were more diverse, the power systems more diffuse. Lugard, a theorist of imperial rule, believed in the preservation of native cultures as long as they fitted his theories of what native cultures should be. In the North, the missionaries and their Western education were discouraged, to prevent what Lugard called their \u2018corrupting influence\u2019 on Islamic schools. Western education thrived in the South. The regions had different interests, saw each other as competitors, and became autonomous at different times; there was no common centre. A nation is, after all, merely an idea. Colonial policy did not succeed in propagating the idea of a nation: indeed, colonial policy did not try to. In the North colonialism entrenched the old elite; in the South it created a new elite, the Western-educated. This small group would form the core of the nationalist movement in the 1950s, agitating for independence. They tried to establish the idea of \u2018nation\u2019 and \u2018tribe\u2019 as binary, in opposition to each other, a strategy they believed was important for the exercise of nation-building. But the politicisation of ethnicity had already gone too far.<\/p>\n
After independence a vicious regional power struggle ensued. The \u2018fear of domination\u2019 of one region by another was everywhere. Elections were rigged. The government was unpopular. Only six years later a group of army majors carried out a coup and murdered top government officials. In the North the coup was seen as an Igbo coup, a plot by the southern Igbo to gain dominance. It didn\u2019t help that the new head of state, in a clumsy attempt to calm the nation, instituted a unitary decree. Instead of regional civil services Nigeria now had a single civil service. A second coup by northern officers saw Igbo officers hunted down and murdered. Then the murders became massacres. \u2018Massacre\u2019 may seem melodramatic. But perhaps because the events leading to the Nigeria-Biafra war are so often eclipsed by the war itself, so little remembered, it seems an apt word for the thousands of Igbo civilians in the North who were killed between May and September 1966, their homes ransacked and set on fire: Nigerian civilians killed by Nigerian civilians. The numbers are still disputed, but most agree that at least seven thousand died. The federal government seemed incapable of stopping the killings. Had the massacres not occurred, or had they been dealt with differently, the south-eastern region would not have seceded and declared itself the independent nation of Biafra.<\/p>\n
The darkest chapter of Nigeria\u2019s history: the Nigeria-Biafra war that left a million people dead, towns completely destroyed and a generation stripped of its innocence. On the Biafran side, intellectuals actively participated in the war, buoyed by their belief in the secessionist cause. They drafted press releases, served as roving ambassadors, made weapons. The best known and most influential African poet in English, Christopher Okigbo, joined the Biafran army. He was a romantic, unsatisfied with the administrative or diplomatic roles his fellow intellectuals took on; Chinua Achebe, his close friend, describes him as a man about whom there was a certain inevitability of drama and event. Mere months into the war, he died in battle. Achebe\u2019s recollection of Okigbo\u2019s death in There Was a Country is brief, and no less moving for that. Achebe hears the announcement on his car radio and pulls up at the roadside:<\/p>\n
The open parkland around Nachi stretched away in all directions. Other cars came and passed. Had no one else heard the terrible news?<\/p>\n
When I finally got myself home and told my family, my three-year-old son, Ike, screamed: \u2018Daddy don\u2019t let him die!\u2019 Ike and Christopher had been special pals. When Christopher came to the house the boy would climb on his knees, seize hold of his fingers and strive with all his power to break them while Christopher would moan in pretended agony. \u2018Children are wicked little devils,\u2019 he would say to us over the little fellow\u2019s head, and let out more cries of feigned pain.<\/p>\n
In the years since the war, Okigbo has become an icon to writers throughout the continent: venerated, enmeshed in myth, his death a striking example of the great tragedy of the war. Achebe almost died too. Before the war started, when Igbo people were under siege in Lagos, soldiers raided his house and only just missed him. Later, his home and his office were bombed, and later still the Biafran army set up an armoury in his porch overnight; his family woke to the sound of shelling and knew it was time to flee. His story is a story of near-misses, of deep scars left by what could have been. After an air raid in Enugu at the beginning of the war, Achebe stares at the ruins of what had been the office of Citadel Press, a publishing company he had started with Okigbo, and thinks: \u2018Having had a few too many homes and offices bombed, I walked away from the site and from publishing for ever.\u2019<\/p>\n
Achebe is the most widely read African author in the world, and was already a known and respected writer in 1967, when he joined the Biafran war effort. He served as an ambassador for Biafra, travelling to different countries to raise support for the beleaguered nation, and participating in various committees, one of which came up with the Ahiara declaration, a moving if starry-eyed document that was the new nation\u2019s intellectual foundation. He has written poems and short stories about Biafra \u2013 Girls at War (1972) is a magnificent collection of stories set there. But many have waited and hoped for a memoir, for his personal take on a contested history. Now at last he has written it. Although it is subtitled \u2018A Personal History of Biafra\u2019, There Was A Country is striking for not being very personal in its account of the war. Instead it is a Nigerian nationalist lament for the failure of the giant that never was; Achebe is mourning Nigeria\u2019s failures, the greatest and most devastating of which was Biafra.<\/p>\n
This is a book for Achebe\u2019s admirers, or for those not unfamiliar with his work. Parts are similar to passages from previous essays, and interspersed in the narrative are poems which, even if tweaked here, have been published before. Keen followers of Achebe will be interested in some of the new material about his life in the first section of the book. But the second section, about the war itself, mostly forgoes personal memory. In writing about the major events, Achebe often recounts what he was told rather than what he felt and the reader is left with a nagging dissatisfaction, as though things are being left unsaid. There are a few glimpses. On a visit to Canada as a Biafran ambassador, one of his hosts at the Canadian Council of Churches made a joke, and in the middle of the loud laughter that followed, it occurred to Achebe that Biafra had become different from other places, where laughter was still available. And, later, hearing a plane take off from Heathrow, he instinctively wanted to dive for cover. There are other small details, but all tantalisingly brief, sometimes oblique. I longed to hear more of what he had felt during those months of war \u2013 in other words, I longed for a more novelistic approach.<\/p>\n
The book\u2019s first section is much more satisfying in this respect: more involved and personal. There is his happy childhood, his close-knit family, with portraits of his father, an upright missionary teacher, and his mother, about whom he writes: \u2018It is her peaceful determination to tackle barriers in her world that nailed down a very important element of my development \u2013 the willingness to bring about change gently.\u2019 The first section is also a celebration of the richness of Igbo philosophy and cosmology and its inclusive culture. In recounting his memory of how welcoming his people were to early white missionaries, he writes about \u2018how wholeheartedly they embraced strangers from thousands of miles away, with their different customs and beliefs\u2019. Although he grew up in a Christian household, with regular Bible readings, he was also drawn to Igbo religion, which he found more \u2018artistically satisfying\u2019. Much of his work is rooted in this tension between old and new, between the Christian religion of his parents and the retreating older religion of his ancestors.<\/p>\n
He began to write Things Fall Apart after a British lecturer told him an earlier story he had written lacked \u2018form\u2019, but was then unable to explain to him what form meant. \u2018I was conscripted by the story,\u2019 he writes, \u2018and I was writing at all times \u2013 whenever there was any opening. It felt like a sentence, an imprisonment of creativity.\u2019 He is, famously, one of the writers who \u2018wrote back\u2019 to the \u2018West\u2019, who challenged, by writing his own story, the dominant and reductive Western images of his people. In his essay \u2018The Novelist as Teacher\u2019 he wrote that he would be happy if his work did nothing more than show his people that theirs had not been a life of darkness before the advent of the Europeans. \u2018The writer,\u2019 he says, \u2018is often faced with two choices \u2013 turn away from the reality of life\u2019s intimidating complexity or conquer its mystery by battling with it. The writer who chooses the former soon runs out of energy and produces elegantly tired fiction.\u2019 On the other hand, his work never sinks under this burden of responsibility.<\/p>\n
He describes the situation in eastern Nigeria in the months leading up to war. In Nigeria\u2019s urban mythology, the war would not have happened had it not been for the personal ambition of the Biafran leader Ojukwu. It is now known that the British high commissioner, David Hunt, wrote a memo to London describing Ojukwu as an overambitious man who had engineered the secession and manipulated his people into supporting him. Many others have repeated this view. Achebe vigorously disputes it: \u2018I believe that following the pogroms, or rather, the ethnic cleansing in the North that occurred over the four months starting in May 1966, which was compounded by the involvement, even connivance, of the federal government \u2026 secession from Nigeria and the war that followed became an inevitability.\u2019 To him it is self-evident that an ethnic group known for its independence of mind could not easily be manipulated into supporting a war. He writes about the reaction among Igbo people after the Northern massacres:<\/p>\n
One found a new spirit among the people, a spirit one did not know existed, a determination in fact. The spirit was that of a people ready to put in their best and fight for their freedom \u2026 But the most vital feeling Biafrans had at that time was that they were finally in a safe place \u2026 at home. This was the first and most important thing, and one could see this sense of exhilaration in the effort that the people were putting into the war. Young girls, for example, had taken over the job of controlling traffic. They were really doing it by themselves \u2013 no one asked them to. That this kind of spirit existed made us feel tremendously hopeful.<\/p>\n
One gets the sense from Achebe\u2019s memoir of a man who is effortlessly himself, who will keep silent rather than say what he doesn\u2019t believe. He is meticulous and sincere in his expressions of praise and gratitude \u2013 to fellow writers, to people who helped him or helped Biafra. He has a sense of humour, but very little cynicism. Today, when many Western male writers of a certain age are mythologised for their bad manners \u2013 rudeness, selfishness etc \u2013 as though great male talent must be accompanied by boorishness, it is refreshing to encounter a great male talent of a certain age who feels no need for posturing.<\/p>\n
Achebe has sometimes been characterised as a writer lacking \u2018style\u2019, that word often used by people for whom prose, to be noteworthy, must be an exercise in flashy phrasemaking. If style is that, a form of pyrotechnics, then this is a fair characterisation of his work. But if style is a distinctive way of writing prose, whatever that may be, then Achebe\u2019s style is quite evident. His sentences are confident. He writes a Nigerian, and sometimes a distinctly Igbo English. His writing is quiet, and in this regard he is similar to writers like William Trevor and Okot p\u2019Bitek. He is free of literary anxiety.<\/p>\n
My kind of storytelling has to add its voice to this universal storytelling before we can say, \u2018Now we\u2019ve heard it all.\u2019 I worry when somebody from one particular tradition stands up and says, \u2018The novel is dead, the story is dead.\u2019 I find this to be unfair, to put it mildly. You told your own story, and now you\u2019re announcing the novel is dead. Well, I haven\u2019t told mine yet.<\/p>\n
His prose, which often has the cadence of spoken Nigerian English in his fiction, is sometimes plainly conversational here. I was reminded of my father, a contemporary of Achebe\u2019s, telling stories of his past, in the circuitous storytelling tradition of the Igbo, each story circling in on itself, revelling in coincidence. I imagine Achebe would tell the stories in this book in much the same way as he writes them, with an elegiac, gentle vagueness, a lack of interest in adhering to hard fact. He \u2018came first or second\u2019 in an exam; his wife\u2019s father died \u2018in the mid-1980s\u2019. There are many repetitions, schoolfriends are introduced more than once, there are digressions, and he casually uses quaint words like \u2018lad\u2019 and \u2018serpent\u2019. There is more of what writing teachers call \u2018telling\u2019 and less \u2018showing\u2019. Sometimes, his stories are fable-like, with the simplicity \u2013 and simplifications \u2013 of that form. In Nigeria under colonial rule, he could travel from Lagos to the south-east at night without worrying about armed robbers.<\/p>\n
This, he argues, is because the British managed their colonies well. His simplification is rooted in disappointment. He is a member of Nigeria\u2019s generation of the bewildered, the people who were fortunate to be educated, who were taught to believe in Nigeria, and who watched, helpless and confused, as the country crumbled. He was a Biafran patriot, as were most of his Igbo colleagues, because they no longer felt they belonged in Nigeria. He still seems surprised, almost disbelieving, not only at the terrible things that happened but at the response, or lack of response, to them. \u2018As many of us packed our belongings to return east some of the people we had lived with for years, some for decades, jeered \u2026 that kind of experience is very powerful. It is something I could not possibly forget.\u2019 Later:<\/p>\n
I was one of the last to flee Lagos. I simply could not bring myself to accept that I could no longer live in my nation\u2019s capital, although the facts clearly said so. My feeling toward Nigeria was one of profound disappointment. Not only because mobs were hunting down and killing innocent civilians in many parts, especially in the North, but because the federal government sat by and let it happen.<\/p>\n
Achebe mourns Biafra, but his anger is directed at the failures of Nigeria. His great disappointment manifests itself in a rare moment of defiance towards the end of the book:<\/p>\n
There are many international observers who believe that Gowan\u2019s actions after the war were magnanimous and laudable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
By Chimamanda Adichie Nigeria, at independence from British rule in 1960, was called the Giant of Africa. With a large population, an educated elite and many natural resources, especially oil,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11242,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles-opinions"],"yoast_head":"\n