Date Published: 09/07/10
Rivers: PDP Faction rejects Contribution Levy Act
A faction of the Peoples Democratic Party in Rivers State that is known as
the ''Founding Members Group'' has rejected Governor Chibuike Amaechi
administration's Social Levy Act which was passed last week by the state
House of Assembly and immediately signed into law by the governor.
The Levy Act did not enjoy the support of some members of the legislative
arm of the state government who are seeing it as another form of taxation
on citizens.
In an on-line statement to AkanimoReports on Tuesday, the state Publicity
Secretary of the PDP faction, Mr. Jerry Needam, said, ''after due
consultation and thorough analysis of the near-draconian social services
levy act being foisted on the state and its residents by Governor Amaechi,
we hereby condemn and reject outrightly the desperate law.''
According to him, ''our stand taken on this issue is derived from a
constitutional provision which makes taxation the exclusive preserve of
the National Assembly.
''Besides, Amaechi stands to tell posterity why the second richest state
in the federation after Lagos State must double-tax its citizens and
residents just to maintain social infrastructure and services which are
provided elsewhere just for the normal taxes paid and payable''.
The rest of their statement went thus:
''It behooves the governor to also explain to Rivers people what
modalities are or will be put in place to ensure that all those who may
enlist to benefit from the educational and health services in the State,
especially those from outside Rivers State , actually have a part to play
in sustaining the trust fund. Or will this be another case of punishing
Rivers people to benefit outsides who can capitalize on the situation to
send their children to boarding schools in the State even when they are
not resident in the State and cannot be taxed for the services.
''We are bewildered to see a governor, who claims that he saves N1 billion
every month from the several tens of billion that accrue to the State
monthly, insist in having the State legislature authorize him to force the
levy down the throats of the same people who have this surplus, throwing
caution and decorum to the wind and returning to the assembly to
pressurize for a dead bill to be passed by all means.
''Amaechi is yet to convince Rivers people on his actual intention to
impose this multiple taxation on them even when they are yet to benefit
from the taxes they pay as they clearly generate their own light, drill
out their own water and produce other social services by themselves.
''If Amaechi internally generated revenue cannot yield amply in an
economically viable and obviously rich State like Rivers, then the social
services levy, even if implemented, will only be a means of lining the
pockets of those who share creed and imaginations with him as government
will also not benefit from it.
''The zeal and obstinacy with which the governor is going about the
actualization of the levy leaves one wondering whether the law is for the
good of the State or just for the benefit of those behind it.
''By clear definition, laws are made to cater for the wellbeing of the
people, and are made for the people and not the people for the laws.
Therefore, it is most baffling that despite the total rejection of the law
by the people and all professional groups in the State, the governor is
still pushing for it, so much so that he threatened to discredit the
assembly before the people(?) if they do not pass the executive bill into
law.
''Rather than partner with professional bodies who know and have counseled
that existing taxes in the State can buoy it to successfully fund the
education and health sectors, all the governor wants is the power to
forcefully deep into the pockets of the already impoverished Rivers people
and scratch out what is left in them to satisfy his whims.
''He seems to disagree that the voice of the people is the voice of God.
Perhaps only his voice is the voice of God, if short being one above the
voice of God.
''Amaechi must accept that the people have spoken. He must accept that he
is only a servant of the people and should not foist on them what they
have outrightly rejected.
''On several occasions he has stated that he is not a monarch, but on
several occasions he has led life like a most intolerant monarch.'' |