Date Published: 07/28/11
Oni hails NJC over Probe Panel report
Former governor of Ekiti State, Chief Segun Oni has hailed the
National Judicial Council (NJC) over the report of the probe panel it
set up to investigate allegations of unethical behaviours against the
President Court of Appeal, Justice Isa Ayo Salami, saying; "For once,
the judiciary has giving Nigerians hope that there won’t come a day,
when a judge would sit on his own divorce case to punish his errant
wife simply because he occupies a privileged position.”
Oni, who reacted to newspaper reports on the NJC probe panel report
through his Chief Media Aide, Wale Ojo-Lanre said; "Our case before
the NJC was premised on unethical relationship between Justice Salami
and the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) leaders that has been
established by the NJC."
The former governor described the panel report as the first and
crucial leg in his crusade against injustice, adding that; "The coast
is now clear for the commencement of our case at the Ado-Ekiti Appeal
Court, which was adjourned sine die because of the NJC report.
"Rule 1 (2) (a) of Rules of the Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers
of the Federal Republic of Nigeria provides that: 'A judicial officer
must avoid social relationships that are improper or give rise to an
appearance of impropriety, that cast doubt on the judicial officer’s
ability to decide cases impartially, or that bring disrepute to the
judiciary.
"Rule 2 (C) (1) states that: A Judicial Officer should disqualify
himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be
questioned..
"Therefore, with the establishment of relationship with between
Justice Salami and ACN leaders, sane minds should know by now that
whatever judgment delivered by such a judge on any case that concerns
the ACN cannot stand.
"This position is premised on the authority of judicial decisions and
pronouncements of eminent jurists, including but not limited to Lord
Denning (MR).
"In the case of METROPOLITAN PROPERTIES COMPANY (FGC) LTD v LANNON &
ORS (1968) 3 All ER 304 @ 310 Lord Denning MR held thus: 'in
considering whether there was a real likelihood of bias, the Court
does not look at the mind of the chairman of the Tribunal whoever it
may be, who sits in judicial capacity. It does not look to see if
there was real likelihood that he would, or did, in fact favour one
side at the expense of the other the Court looks at the impression
which would be given to other people. Even if he was as impartial as
could be, nevertheless, if right minded persons would think that, in
the circumstance there was a real likelihood of bias on his part, then
he should not sit. And if does sit, his decision cannot stand."
On allegation of financial inducement on which the panel reportedly
cleared Justice Salami, Oni said; "We are not concerned about that.
Our grouse is on unethical conduct of the justices, which we premised
on improper relationship and by extension, the likelihood of bias. So
far, so good, that has been established by the NJC panel."
|