Home Exclusive Atiku demands specific documents from CSU to boost chances at Supreme Court

Atiku demands specific documents from CSU to boost chances at Supreme Court

by Our Reporter
Hours after the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) dismissed the case of Atiku Abubakar against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the former vice president filed yet another case at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for a subpoena to Chicago State University (CSU) to produce documents, information, or objects or to permit inspection of premises in a civil action.
Shortly after the judgment, Atiku had served intent to head to the Supreme Court. It is believed that the specific documents sought would enhance his chances of invalidating the judgment of the Appeal Court by the Supreme Court.
Documents requested included: A true and correct copy of any diploma for a Bachelor of Science degree issued by CSU in 1979; a true and correct copy of any diploma issued by CSU in 1979 to Mr. Tinubu; true and correct copies of any diplomas issued by CSU (other than to Mr. Tinubu) that contain the same font, seal, signatures, and wording (other than the name of the recipient and the specific degree awarded) as contained in Exhibit C which purports to be a CSU diploma issued to Mr. Tinubu on or about June 22, 1979.
Other documents that are true and correct copies of any CSU documents relating to Mr. Tinubu that were certified by Jamar C. Orr, Esq; and a declaration, and all communications to or from CSU concerning the certification of such documents by Jamar C. Orr, Esq., during the period August 1, 2022 to August 1, 2023.
The suit supported with several documents also sought appearance of representative(s) of CSU at a time, date, and place set forth in the supporting documents to testify at a deposition to be taken in this civil action.
Recall that after the judgment Atiku had said: “I am therefore here to tell you that, though the judgment of the court yesterday is respected, it is a judgment that I refuse to accept. I refuse to accept the judgment because I believe that it is bereft of substantial justice.
“Consequently, I have asked my lawyers to activate my constitutionally guaranteed rights of appeal to the higher court, which, in the instance, is the Supreme Court. It is my conviction that the electoral process in Nigeria should be devoid of untidy manipulations and that the outcome of every election should be a perfect reflection of the wishes of the electorate.
“I believe that such is the only way through which our democracy can have a manifest expression of its true meaning. Whether I prevail in this quest or not, the record of my effort in ensuring an order of credible elections in Nigeria shall remain for the future generations to evaluate,” the former vice president said.

You may also like