Home Articles & Opinions Boko Haram: Is there a Conspiracy of Borno Stakeholders?

Boko Haram: Is there a Conspiracy of Borno Stakeholders?

by Our Reporter

By Musa Ladan

The occasional attempts by Boko Haram insurgents to make statements with
poorly thought out but nonetheless daring attacks for me is a thing of
concern. I am concerned not because I think the group can resurge to the
sick height it got to in its depravity but because factors and persons
outside of the group would want it to and seem to be doing all they can to
return the country into the nightmare scenario.

This concerns are neither misplaced nor exaggerated. For instance, I have
constantly asked myself what it is that the people of the North-East,
particularly Borno want.  To the best of my knowledge and based on new
reports, Boko Haram has been largely degraded while several pledges have
been made toward rebuilding the area – there is even a Northeast
Development Commission in the offing with the enabling Act in the making
before the National Assembly. What is however missing is the buy-in and
support of those that parade as the leaders in Borno state.

Their contributions, if they can be so called, have been mostly petty
politics, bickering and self-interest that have only served to distract the
anti-terror fight. In some instances, these attitudes transcend the scope
of distraction to look like deliberate acts of sabotaging efforts at
bringing peace back to the place.

I consider the case of the Senator representing Borno Central, Baba Kaka
Grabai, who as recently as February this year claimed that the terror group
controlled half of the state when the reverse was the case. He made this
allegation at a time when the insurgents barely controlled one local
government or have been largely funnelled into Sambisa forest where troops
are still cleaning out remnants of the terror group. There other
politicians in the state that are of the same bend. They act to boost the
morale of insurgents and they cannot claim this was being done unwittingly.

The Chibok Girl’s Parents Association has been no less disruptive. Its
chairman, Mr. Yakubu Nkeki‎, was more interested in the place of ancestry
of a rescued girl than in the hope offered by another child escaping
slavery and deprivation. The throve of intelligence she could offer and
assist with the rescue of scores of the children still in the grips of
terrorists was insignificant so long as she was not abducted in Chibok or
not on a list that the military had compiled of the stolen girls. The
association through its utterances after the rescues suggested Chibok is a
distinct state of the federation or even an independent republic that had
no business with the rest of the country.

I am equally challenging Borno Elders Forum to prove they have done enough
and that they have not been used or being used by embedded interests in
their ranks. They have taken positions in the past that left me wondering
whether as elders they truly want the crisis to end and life returning to
normal.
No less deserving of my dissatisfaction is the National Security Adviser
(NSA), Brig-Gen. Babagana Munguno (rtd), who incidentally hails from that
state. Layman thinking would project that he would pitch in his best to use
his office to restore peace to the state but nothing – body language,
utterances and actions, has shown that he has any interest in ending the
insurgency even now that Boko Haram has been battered to its weakest.  He
should, in my expectations, be on the case of the Ministry of Defence and
military services to deliver the last surviving Boko Haram terrorist to him
for trial. Such request would follow only after properly empowering them of
course. I don’t think any right thinking person would have accused him of
being partial or sectional because the northeast is deserving of all the
national attention it can get now.

And there are the other assorted collection of groups and caucuses that are
used as fronts by the vicious politicians from the state and at federal
level, who possibly want terrorism to be sustained because they have turned
it into an industry; there is money to be made from federal government
funding and international organisations’ intervention. If the group that
necessitated the interventions gets wiped out, then the cash runs dry so
for them this is not a desirable outcome. So they cook up the most
outrageous of stories to float so that troops can be distracted and the
federal government left in confusion. Among their ranks are the
collaborators that validate bogus claims of questionable NGOs that attempt
to cripple troop’s ability to fight.

Not to be outdone are the so called activists from other states and the FCT
that have somehow discovered that there is money to be made from disasters.
The continued existence of Boko Haram guarantees their meal tickets since
each atrocity the group commits provides another item to use for
blackmailing the government.

I advise the Presidency that whatever progress is being made in the fight
against Boko Haram must be weighed against the true intention of the
leaders in Borno state. Do they want terrorism to be defeated or are they
kin on retaining it as an industry? How much has the collective attitude
and influence of the all the groups identified above contributed to our not
having finished the fight? Who else among the state’s population are
working to continue giving the incentives to terrorists? What roles have
these various groups played at the various stages of the conflict?

I strongly think it would be damaging if President Buhari in his May 2017
speech has to again refer to the Boko Haram fight in the present continuous
tense simply because the very people of the state are frustrating the war
to end the insurgency. In case they have not noticed, the war is costing
anything in the region of a fourth of our (real) national expenditure in
addition to costing the lives of other Nigerians from other states. There
is another security concern brewing up in the South-south for which the
military is needed. So we cannot be fixated on Borno state forever. Those
sustaining terrorism in the state – actively, through inaction or just
sabotage – should know that the fundamentals of the crisis are not
inelastic; something will give soon.

Ladan, a lecturer contributed this piece from University of Maiduguri.

You may also like