246
By Oscar Okhifo
The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has adjourned the trial of social media critic, Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), on charges of cyberbullying and defamation involving celebrities Iyabo Ojo, Tonto Dikeh, and music producer Samklef.
Presiding Judge, Justice Musa Liman, postponed proceedings on Thursday, July 24, 2025, to December 2, 2025, after other matters occupied the court’s sitting time.
VDM was re-arraigned on May 15, 2025, by the Nigerian Police on a five-count charge under Section 24 of the Cybercrime Act.
The activist was accused of publishing harmful and false content online between October 2023 and March 2024, including posts alleged to have threatened, defamed, or incited harassment against the complainants.
Among the claims presented by the prosecution was a video published on October 29, 2023, in which VDM reportedly said:
“One Iyabo Ojo is having an indecent sexual relationship with her daughter.”
He also allegedly accused Tonto Dikeh of diverting funds raised during the “Justice for Mohbad” campaign and operating the controversial Gistlover blog.
Another video cited in court, posted on March 19, 2024, was said to have included derogatory remarks about senior police officials and legislators.
VDM pleaded not guilty to all charges and remains on ₦10 million bail with two sureties. His lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, appealed that the previous bail conditions set by Justice Mobolaji Olajuwon be upheld. The prosecution, led by Victor Okoye, raised no objections.
“There was no objection from the prosecution,” Adeyanju told the court, assuring his client’s continued bail status.
The adjournment has sparked widespread reactions across social media, with opinions sharply divided. Supporters of VDM argue that he is a whistleblower being punished for challenging powerful figures.
“This is a classic case of the state using its weight to silence a social critic,” said Tunde Peters, a digital rights advocate.
“The court must be careful not to criminalize opinion under the guise of cybercrime.” says Tope, a University student.
Conversely, others believe VDM crossed ethical lines.
“What he said about Iyabo and Tonto wasn’t criticism. It was reckless and vile. He must be held accountable,” said Amina Oladipo, a Lagos-based lawyer and women’s rights advocate.
Legal analysts say the case could set a critical precedent on how far free speech extends online under Nigeria’s cybercrime laws.
“The courts must strike a balance between digital activism and protection from online abuse,” said Barr. Femi Oketola, a constitutional lawyer.
“This case is about much more than celebrity gossip. It’s a legal stress test for digital accountability.”
As the trial now shifts to a December date, all eyes remain on the courtroom where justice by precedent or punishment, will eventually be served.