Home News FG Drops Charges Against Kogi Senator, Court Strikes Out Case

FG Drops Charges Against Kogi Senator, Court Strikes Out Case

by Our Reporter
By Oscar Okhifo, Abuja
An Abuja High Court on Thursday formally struck out criminal charges against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, ending a months-long legal battle that had drawn nationwide attention and sparked debate over political accountability and freedom of expression.
The development came after the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed a Notice of Discontinuance, asking the court to drop the criminal defamation and related charges previously brought against the Kogi Central lawmaker.
The case originated from comments Akpoti-Uduaghan allegedly made during a televised interview.
 Its prosecution had stirred intense discussion on the boundaries of free speech and the scope of prosecutorial powers in a democratic society.
Dated December 12, 2025, the Notice of Discontinuance effectively concluded proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025. Presiding Judge Justice C. N. Oji acknowledged the notice and struck out the case, highlighting the importance of restraint in the exercise of prosecutorial authority.
Confirming the withdrawal in court, counsel for the Federal Government said the move was in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.
“On behalf of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, we have filed a notice of discontinuance in line with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act,” he stated.
Reacting after the court session, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan described the outcome as a vindication of her position.
 “Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law. I remain committed to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, while thanking her legal team and supporters for their steadfast backing throughout the proceedings.
The striking out of the charges brings an end to a controversy that had drawn national scrutiny, with civil society groups and rights organisations previously criticizing the case as an attempt to stifle free speech and discourage political engagement.

You may also like