Home News Rights Group Threatens  Legal Action Against Compulsory Voting Bill

Rights Group Threatens  Legal Action Against Compulsory Voting Bill

by Our Reporter
By Lizzy Chirkpi
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has announced its intention to legally challenge the controversial bill seeking to make voting compulsory for all eligible Nigerians. The human rights group warns that the proposed legislation poses a severe threat to constitutional liberties and democratic principles.
The bill, which has already passed its second reading in the House of Representatives, was sponsored by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Abbas Tajudeen. It aims to amend the Electoral Act 2022 to criminalize voter abstention, proposing a fine of up to ₦100,000 or imprisonment for eligible citizens who fail to vote in national and state elections.
In a statement issued over the weekend in Abuja, HURIWA National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko, condemned the bill as a “dangerous and unconstitutional overreach.” He argued that it seeks to enforce democratic participation through coercion rather than fostering trust in the electoral process.
“This is not just an ill-advised piece of legislation — it is a blatant assault on the fundamental rights enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution. Voting is a right, not a state-imposed obligation. Any attempt to transform that right into a mandatory duty, punishable by law, is dictatorial and anti-democratic,” the statement signed by Onwubiko.
Onwubiko revealed that HURIWA is already in advanced consultations with a consortium of human rights lawyers and constitutional experts to file a suit to halt the bill, even before it becomes law, citing its inherent unconstitutionality and dangerous implications for democratic freedoms.
HURIWA asserted that while increasing voter turnout is a legitimate policy goal, it must not come at the expense of civil liberties. “Compelling people to vote through threats of punishment does not build democracy — it destroys it,” the group stated.
Citing Sections 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which guarantee freedom of expression and association, HURIWA emphasized that these rights include the freedom not to engage – a crucial, though often overlooked, element of participatory democracy.
“Refusing to vote is in itself a political statement, and any law that criminalizes such a decision is attempting to silence dissent,” Onwubiko said.
Referencing opinions from Nigeria’s legal community, including NBA President Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN) and Femi Falana (SAN), HURIWA stated that the real challenge isn’t that Nigerians are unwilling to vote, but that they no longer believe their votes count. “Rather than threatening the people, the National Assembly should focus on rebuilding the integrity of our electoral institutions,” HURIWA urged.
HURIWA called on other civil rights organizations, pro-democracy advocates, and public interest litigators to unite in opposition to the bill and join its legal action.
“This is the moment for every patriotic citizen to speak out. Today, it’s compulsory voting. Tomorrow, it could be state-mandated political allegiance or punishment for non-membership of parties. The slope is slippery and the consequences are dire,” Onwubiko warned.
He noted that democratic countries with compulsory voting, such as Belgium or Australia, operate within robust democratic frameworks that have strong civic education systems, high trust in institutions, and transparent governance structures.
“But Nigeria is not Belgium.”
“We are grappling with electoral malpractice, judicial compromise, rising autocracy, and insecurity. To superimpose a coercive law like this in our environment is both misguided and malevolent.”
HURIWA urged the National Assembly to redirect its legislative efforts toward real electoral reforms that address the root causes of voter apathy, including ending impunity for rigging, prosecuting electoral offenders, strengthening INEC’s independence, and eliminating political thuggery and vote-trading.
“Democracy cannot thrive where fear replaces choice. Free, fair, and credible elections are the heart of democracy — and that starts with the right to choose whether or not to participate,” Onwubiko emphasized.
As the bill progresses, HURIWA has pledged sustained advocacy and civil mobilization, including public awareness campaigns and international engagement, to ensure the Nigerian public and the world fully understand the threat it poses.
“This bill must not become law. It is not just an affront to legal rights — it is a direct assault on the spirit of democracy,” HURIWA concluded, urging Nigerians, especially the legal and civil society communities, to remain vigilant against attempts to legislate dictatorship under the guise of democratic reform.

You may also like