A Human Rights Lawyer and Activist, Oghenejabor Ikimi hasdragged Governor
Ifeanyi Okowa of Delta State to the State High Court sitting in Otor-Udu
, overthe controversial passenger welfare levy recently introduced by the
stategovernment.The firebrand legal luminary in a Suit No: OUHC/111/2016
OGHENEJABOR IKIMI, ESQ., VS.GOVERNOR OFDELTA STATE and 2 ORS, wants the
Court to determine the following:1. WHETHER theDefendants’ Passenger
Welfare Scheme and the daily tax paid by operatorsof motorcycles
and tricycles in Delta State are in tandem with
the taxes and levies approved for collection by StateGovernment
under Part II of the Schedule to the Taxes and Levies (Approved Listfor
Collection) Act, 2004 (as amended).2. WHETHER the Defendants can collect
taxes and levies thatare not listed in Part II of the Schedule to the
Taxes and Levies (ApprovedList for Collection) Act, 2004 (as amended) in
Delta State.3. WHETHER the assessment or collection of taxes or levieson
behalf of the Defendants by private tax consultants or private
individualsand bodies is in tandem with the provisions of Sections 2(1), 3
and 4 of theTaxes and Levies (Approved List for Collection) Act, 2004 (as
amended).Besides, he wants the Court to consider the following
provisions:Part II of the Schedule to the Taxes and Levies (Approved List
for Collection)Act, 2004, Part II of the Schedule to
the Taxes and Levies (Approved List for Collection)
Act,(Amendment)Order, 2015 and Sections 2(1), 3 and 4 of the Taxes and
Levies (Approved Listfor Collection) Act, 2004.The Claimant’s claim
against the Defendants jointly andseverally is as follows:a) A Declaration
that the Defendants’ Passengers WelfareScheme and the daily tax paid by
operators of motorcycles and tricycles inDelta State are not in tandem
with the taxes and levies approved for collection by
State Government under Part II of the Schedule to the Taxes and
Levies(Approved List for Collection) Act, 2004 (as amended).b) A
Declaration that the Defendants cannot collect any taxor levy not listed
in Part II of the Schedule to the Taxes and Levies (Approved
List for Collection) Act, 2004 (as amended). c) A Declaration
that the assessment or collection of taxes or levies on behalf of
the Defendants by private taxconsultants or private individuals or bodies
is not in tandem with theprovisions of Sections 2(1), 3 and 4 of the Taxes
and Levies (Approved List forcollection) Act, 2004 (as amended).d)
Perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants from
further collecting Passengers Welfare Scheme levies and
motorcycle and tricycle taxes in Delta State as same
contravenes Part II of the Schedule to the Taxes and
Levies (Approved List for Collection) Act, 2004 (as amended). e)
Perpetualinjunction restraining the Defendants from further collecting
taxes and levies inDelta State that are not listed in Part II of the
Schedule to theTaxes and Levies(Approved List for Collection) Act, 2004
(as amended). f) Perpetual injunction restraining the
Defendants from further using private tax consultants orprivate
individuals or bodies for assessing and collecting taxes and levies
onbehalf of the Defendant in Delta State as same negates the provisions
ofSections2(1), 3 and 4 of the Taxes and Levies (Approved
List for Collection) Act, 2004 (as amended). AND any
othersuitable relief or other orders this Honourable Court may deem it to
make in thecircumstance.
LAWYER DRAGS OKOWA TO COURT OVER PASSENGER WELFARE LEVY
917
previous post

