Governorship Election Tribunal recognising Mr Henry Bello as the
authentic counsel of the African Action Congress ( AAC) in the appeal
filed by the defeated Rivers State African Action Congress ( AAC)
Governorship Candidate, Biokpomabo Awara.
The defeated Rivers State African Action Congress ( AAC) Governorship
Candidate, Biokpomabo Awara through his counsel, Tawo Tawo (SAN) in suit
number CA/PH/PHT/356/2019 urged the Court of Appeal to stop Henry Bello
from representing the AAC in the Governorship Petition.
Delivering the lead judgment, Justice Hamma Barka struck out the AAC
interlocutory appeal on the ground that the appellant has no locus to
file the appeal as he is no longer the counsel to AAC.
The Court of Appeal also ruled that the Appeal filed by the defeated
Rivers State AAC Governorship Candidate is incompetent, having been
filed without prior leave of court.
The Court noted that judgement of a court is sacrosanct which all
parties are bound to obey. The Court emphasised that AAC has right to
change its counsel based on the judgement of the Federal High Court
which recognized Leonard Nzenwa as the National Chairman of the party.
The court recognised counsel of the AAC, Henry Bello filed a preliminary
objection on the premise of section 242 of the constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) , saying that the Appeal
is incompetent.
Counsel to INEC, Sir Steve Adave (SAN), said the decision of the Court
of Appeal lays to rest the issue of representation in the suit filed by
the defeated Rivers State AAC Governorship Candidate.
Counsel to the AAC, Henry Aleruchi of Henry Bello Chambers, said that
the party sacked Omoyele Sowore and elected Leonard Nzenwa who
subsequently appointed Henry Bello as the authentic counsel of the
party.
He said that the ruling of the Court of Appeal is in consonance with the
constitution, which gives the individuals the right to choose their
counsels.
In a preliminary objection, Counsel to Rivers State Governor, Nyesom
Ezenwo Wike, Emmanuel Ukala (SAN) argued that the appellant is not a
person affected by the decision/ruling of the Tribunal and accordingly
has no locus standi or competence to appeal the judgment of the
Tribunal.
Ukala further argued that the Appellant’s Appeal has been mooted and
rendered academic by subsequent events including the striking out of the
substantive appeal by the Tribunal.
Mark Agwu, who spoke on behalf of Emmanuel Ukala (SAN), counsel to
Governor Nyesom Wike , said the ruling has proved that the appeal is a
mere academic exercise and lacks merit.
“The genesis of the issue was that the petition was filed by the Chamber
of Tawo E. Tawo representing both petitioners but in course of the
processings the AAC decided to debrief the chambers of Tawo E Tawo and
engage the chambers of HA Bello to represent it. In the course of that
HA Bello fulfilled the condition which you can now change your counsel.
‘After that Tawo brought an application asking court to set aside the
change of counsel filed by HA Bello after hearing the argument, the
tribunal came to the decision that the party deserve its right to engage
counsel of his choice, that is sacrosanct and nobody can change it.
Preliminary objection was raised to the effect that AAC now having
changed their counsel Tawo now lacks locus standi to represent it”
He said that the Court of Appeal has confirmed the ruling of the Federal
High Court that Leonard Nzenwa is the National Chairman of the AAC
Counsel to Biokpomabo Awara, Defeated AAC governorship candidate, Mr
David Adebe of the Tawo Tawo Chambers, said they will study the judgment
and decide on the next line of action.
“The court in their opinion said they did not agree with our view but by
the time our principals consult with the client, then they will decide
which way forward”, he said.